I Did Not Like This Book

Going To See The Elephant
Rodes Fishburne
Delacorte Press
January 2009
304 pages

“Going To See The Elephant” borrows an arcane phrase to evoke times past, and a baroque sense of adventure. However, Rodes Fishburne’s debut novel never quite gets out of its own way long enough to deliver on that promise. Using a struggling writer as a protagonist is a risky move. As Slater Brown slowly goes broke while trying to write the Great American Novel in San Fransisco, he litters his notebooks with decorative turns of phrase that never lead anywhere. While these short, self-conscious bursts of words might make decorative flourishes in a poem, or might serve as touchstones in a more focused narrative, here, they compound the main character’s aimlessness, frustrating and alienating the reader. It’s a shame to see this narrative so weighted down by its central character.
Once Slater finally finds a job at the struggling weekly newspaper, the Morning Trumpet, the story begins to pick up, as other characters focus Slater away from his own, tiresome thoughts. As he begins covering stories, other characters rescue the novel from Slater’s numbing self-absorbtion. His gruff editor named Motherlove, Tucker Oswell, the binge-eating mayor, and the mysterious woman who calls herself Callio, each perk the novel up when the narrative shifts to their eccentric perspective. The few glimpses of San Fransisco through Slater Brown’s eyes hint at the potential for a quirky novel with a strong sense of place. There’s a lot of beautiful language sprinkled throughout this novel and frustrated potential it never quite realizes, but ultimately, the story is not terribly compelling.

Published in: on January 30, 2009 at 11:06 am Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , ,

Quote of the moment

It’s hard to arrange words right when you know that the right sentence can melt a reader’s knees.” – Daniel Shannon, via favrd.com

I wish more writers lived by that goal.

Published in: on at 9:25 am Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Balling The Jack (book review)

Balling the Jack
Frank Baldwin
Simon and Schuster
July 1998
(out of print, so used price fluctuates)
268 pages

Tom Reasons is a gambler. He chafes at his dull job as a Wall Street paralegal. He thinks about Lisa, his ex, more than he’s willing to admit. And every Friday night, he gambles his entire paycheck. If he wins, he wins big. It’s a week of concerts, buying rounds for his friends, chasing women. If he loses, it’s a week of ramen, and looking forward to the next week.
When, a drunken bet lands him on the wrong side of Joe Duggan, the snarling Irish captain of the Hellions, a rival darts team from Hell’s Kitchen, the stakes and stress are higher than Tom could have imagined. Raising the money, dreading a rematch with the Hellions, and trying to convince Lisa to come back turns into a massive adventure through New York’s bar scene and even some of the city’s darkest elements.

The adventure of this book is great fun. Entire chapters read like an in-joke or a love letter to New York city’s Irish bar scene. Names are changed just enough to be decoded with a knowing grin, if you’ve ever played darts, or quaffed a pint of Guinness in a New York city bar. A band called “The Coffin Ships” is absolutely not Black 47. We promise. A few readers might have fun decoding and placing the various bars in Tom Reason’s adventures, from the slight descriptions offered in the fast-paced prose.
But- even if you have never been to New York and have no idea how to score a game of 501 or Cricket, take a gamble on this book. At times, Tom Reasons, smug and slightly immature, comes off like a bit of a selfish jerk. But, as the stakes get higher, he’s just panicked enough to turn sympathetic and human. And yes, some of the plot twists are predictable. But it’s a heck of a fun ride, full of excellent characters and a bit of suspense. It’s almost as much fun to read this as it is to spend a night out, with friends, throwing a few darts and having a few beers.

Fahrenheit 451 a Prose Poem?

ChrisL wrote a gorgeous post about rediscovering Ray Bradbury.

When I was a teenager, in the course of a few years I gobbled books by all the masters of science fiction — Heinlein, Asimov, Bradbury, Harlan Ellison — paying more attention to plot than prose. That was mostly appropriate, both as  a 13-year-old and because for most, what made the books special was their exquisite and inventive plots. I know I read Fahrenheit 451: what I remembered most vividly was the ending scenes of old men whispering excerpts to one another, which is where its stellar plot takes you. After I left the boys behind for a more varied literary canon, I lumped Bradbury in with the others and never looked back.

This week, the book came into my hands almost accidentally. “OK, how come no one told me he’s  a poet?” I asked Rachel, astonished by its first pages.

I’ll have to go back and reread it.  I remember being scared by the idea of books being destroyed.  Not just spooked, but horrified on a deeper, visceral level.  Yikes!

Published in: on January 28, 2009 at 8:25 pm Leave a Comment

New! My Amazon Store

I’ve started an Amazon Store!

Over the next few days, I’ll be making it spiffy, and adding books I’ve reviewed for the Ledger and other publications, as well as the books I’ve reviewed exclusively on my site.

I like the fact that their default color scheme looks rather coordinated with the site design I’m using.

Book Monogamy, Book Fu, and Fun Things

The folks at Read Street want to know.  Are you a monogamous reader or polygamous? No, not that kind of monogamy — that’s your business, and we don’t need to know about it. We mean literary monogamy. Do you read one book at a time? Or do you have two or more going at once — say, a novel, a nonfiction book and a collection of short stories?” I have to wonder- what does that analogy say about those of us who get paid to review books?  Yikes!

A book can be a helpful tool in self defense, according to this British film clip.

Every time I read about the surrender of the book to the digital age, I get the willies.  Here’s an excerpt from The New Atlantis, on “People of the Screen.” To wit: Nearly half of Americans ages 18 to 24 read no books for pleasure; Americans ages 15 to 24 spend only between 7 and 10 minutes per day reading voluntarily; and two thirds of college freshmen read for pleasure for less than an hour per week or not at all. As Sunil Iyengar, director of the NEA’s Office of Research and Analysis and the lead author of the report, told me, “We can no longer take the presence of books in the home for granted. Reading on one’s own—not in a required sense, but doing it because you want to read—that skill has to be cultivated at an early age.” The NEA report also found that regular reading is strongly correlated with civic engagement, patronage of the arts, and charity work. People who read regularly for pleasure are more likely to be employed, and more likely to vote, exercise, visit museums, and volunteer in their communities; in short, they are more engaged citizens.

Musing Monday: Lending Books

Today’s Musing Monday asks: “What is your policy on lending books? Do you lend books to anyone or just friends?”

I am a huge fan of lending books to people. Or borrowing books. Sometimes for an extended period of time. (Sheepishly.) And there are a few books I wish I could get in packs of 10 at a time, some kind of frequent-buyer program. Books that I absolutely adore and wind up recommending to people incessantly. This list probably also functions as a field guide to my psyche, in some strange interpretive way.

The main ones are:
- The Westing Game, by Ellen Raskin
- The Art of Drowning- Billy Collins
- Ender’s Game and Speaker For the Dead- Orson Scott Card
The Callahan Chronicals- Spider Robinson
Callahan’s Lady- Spider Robinson
Bobos in Paradise- David Brooks
Those are the essentials I will recommend no matter who you are and what we think of each other. Other recommendations and borrowings will be more individually tailored.

I also spend a lot of time recommending The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova. Less because it has any deep resonance for me- and more because I know a huge number of people who love vampire fiction, and I want to rescue them from the likes of “Twilight” and Anne Rice. Bleah!

Really, I’m okay with lending a book that I’m not going to see again. Maybe it’s on a journey towards someone new, and being read and enjoyed by people I don’t know. I like that. Wish the library took such a zen view to my overdue fines. heh.

Entertainment Weekly’s New Classics

Grabbed this from Sassymonkey. Entertainment Weekly has a list of what it’s calling the New Classics. I’ve read a small handful of them. I have a few questions. Why is Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire “>Harry Potter and the Goblet Of Fire on the list, when Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban isn’t? Would also like to compare Entertainment Weekly’s list to other modern classics lists.

Hmm.

List behind the cut, with the ones I’ve read crossed out. Going through, I’ve read more of these than I expected.  There are also quite a few, where I’ve read something else by the author, but not the book that made the list.  Don DeLillo, Neil Gaiman, Alan Moore, and Amy Tan

(more…)

Used Books Are Wonderful

Sassymonkey, one of my favorite book bloggers wrote a post on BlogHer, called “Used Book Buyers Are Not Bad People.”
Her post is thoughtfully written, as are many of the comments that respond to her post.
(more…)

Independent Bookstore Reading Challenge

The Bookstore People, Kim and Claire have a fantastic reading challenge up.

The Independent Bookstore Reading Challenge

From their site:

Challenge Guidelines

Here are the rules: go to independent bookstores that are new to you between January 1 and December 31, 2009 and have some sort of interaction.  The challenge comes with different levels you can sign up for:

  • Scout – Visit 2 independent bookstores (easy!)
  • Specialist – Visit 2 subject matter specialty bookstores (i.e., travel, children, cooking)
  • Nationalist – Visit 2 independent bookstores and 1 additional bookstore in a state you do not live in
  • Continental – Visit 2 independent bookstores and 1 additional bookstore in another N. American country (that would be the USA, Canada or Mexico)
  • Globetrotter – Visit 2 independent bookstores and 1 additional bookstore on a different continent (if you’re going to Europe, check out Bookstore Guide)
  • Type A Personality to the Max – Satisfy any two categories

We’ll have a page dedicated to the challenge where you can sign up and leave comments.  Plus, we’d love to have a review of the stores you’ve found and liked (we ignore stores with bad service or stock), we’ll post it with a description of you and a link back to your blog (if you have one), just e-mail it to me at kim@bookstorepeople.com.  In fact, we encourage cross posting bookstore reviews so post on your blog, Indiebound, Yelp, City Search, City Guide and any other place that would like it.

We’ll Give out a Prize!



***********
I plan to sign up for the Type A Challenge. Because I am always eager to find new specialty bookstores, and new indie bookstores that are local to me. And because I’m hoping like mad to get some international travel in this year- to a country where the bookstores are tourist attractions in their own right. (Scotland’s my current favorite.)

Added wrinkle to the challenge. If possible, pick up a book from a local or regional author. I’m just saying…

Published in: on January 24, 2009 at 12:00 am Comments (1)